MMMM Meat...Except on Monday

This year the San Diego Unified School District has decided to implement “Meatless Mondays” in the elementary schools.  I know many people that do “Meatless Mondays”.  Essentially you don’t eat meat on Mondays and instead replace it with vegetable substitutes.  The reasoning behind this is that by getting kids to do this at a young age will help to teach them better nutrition habits.  And in a world where childhood obesity is on a sharp rise I have to applaud them in the effort.  However, replacing one meal at school a week with no meat doesn’t do much for the actual diets of kids.  These diets need to be enforced at home as well.  It seems as though the city has taken on a position of raising the kids vice letting the parents do it.  On the news it was reported that the schools had veggie burgers, and various other wonderful vegetable dishes (I can’t believe I just said wonderful vegetables), but they also had cheese pizza.  So now you’ve taken an idea that is supposed to be healthier and thrown pizza into the mix.  News Flash!!!!  Just because you take the pepperoni off of a pizza does not all of a sudden make it healthy.  I am all for children learning proper nutrition.  I, for one, subscribe to the Paleo, or caveman, diet.  In this diet you cut out all the processed foods that are commonplace in this day and age and only eat things that you can grow or kill.  Since I’ve been doing it, I have felt a lot better and managed to lose weight rather quickly, but children won’t be rushing to their parents saying that they can’t eat the various things from fast food restaurants.  Education about nutrition needs to be given to the parents to ensure that their child eats what is right, and at the same time it is up to the parents and their beliefs about what is healthy and what isn’t.  On the other hand you have the overly strict parents that won’t let their children eat any of the “tasty” stuff so when they go to school they look forward to a little bit of “junk” at lunch. 

I applaud San Diego Unified for trying to help curb a problem that is taking the country by storm, but a lot more needs to be done than just not serving meat on Mondays to get kids to like veggies and other healthy options.  Maybe tailor nutrition education to the youngsters.  I think Dr. Oz should do a children version and make it super gross.  Kids love the gross stuff, just look at the slime on Nickelodeon.  Do they even have that anymore?  I live with a 3-year old so haven’t watched Nickelodeon in many, many years.  

Trophies for Everyone

The Ontario Soccer Association has decided to do away with scorekeeping and standings in youth soccer.  To take things even further in this “political correctness” and “every kid is a winner,” the Midlake, Ontario Soccer Association has decided to completely remove the ball from youth soccer games and practices.  According to Helen Dabney-Coyle, a spokesperson for the Association, “By removing the ball, it’s absolutely impossible to say ‘this team won’ and ‘this team lost’ or ‘this child is better at soccer than that child.’”  They want children to learn that sports is not about competition, rather about using your imagination.  If you imagine that you’re good at soccer, then you are. 

This has taken the “everyone that competes will get a trophy” to the next level.  When I was growing up, I was not good at sports, so I stuck with things that I was good at, academics and music.  My brother, on the other hand, has always been very athletic.  The fact that I lost at every athletic event I tried to compete in didn’t harm me, or make me fragile.  Instead, it taught me to work towards the things I am good at and to realize that not everyone is good at everything. 

Society as a whole is already falling into a trap I like to refer to as the spoiled brat syndrome.  I see it in college right now.  These new incoming freshman feel entitled, they think that they’re owed something.  We saw it with the Occupy Wall Street crowd; the people in big corporations should give their money to people who don’t make as much.  Why?  Because they think that’s the right thing to do.  In reality, the right thing to do is get up, get an education and a degree in something that matters, like Science, Engineering, or Math, versus a degree in something that really doesn’t have a use like Women’s Studies or LGBT Studies. I'm not saying that these degrees don’t have a use, but they should be a second degree not a first degree.  What are you actually going to be able to do with one of those obscure degrees if you haven’t established credibility in the workplace yet?

Kids need to realize that they will succeed at some things and fail at others.  Parents need to quit protecting and sheltering their children so much that they develop a false sense of entitlement; instead they should teach them how the real world actually works.  What this group in Canada is essentially saying is that if I dream that I’m good at math then I really am, when in reality I have a 65%.  What’s going to happen next?  Someone believes that they’re a good doctor, so therefore they start practicing medicine?  What are they going to tell the medical board?  You should give me my medical license because I believe I’m a good doctor and disregard the fact that I failed medical school? 

Society needs to wake up and look at what is going on around it.  It’s already infecting our college systems, and the entry-level job positions post college.  Just wait until it moves its way on up in to management. 

No Score Soccer for Kids

Let Every Child Win 

Do Electric Cars = Zero Emissions? Part 1

Preface:  The initial thought for this post and topic was for it to be much longer, but I have decided to break it down to multiple parts to better analyze different aspects of electric vehicles.  

Electric Cars are not truly Zero Emissions, like the manufactures, and the government would have you believe.  A 2012 analysis in the Journal of Industrial Ecology showed that almost half the lifetime carbon-dioxide emissions from an electric car comes from the energy used to produce the car, especially the batteries; conversely a gas-powered car accounts for only 17% of its lifetime carbon-dioxide emissions from manufacturing.  This equates to 30,000 pounds for an electric car and 14,000 pounds for a gas car at the completion of manufacturing.

Currently, the Nissan Leaf has an estimated range of 73 miles per charge, and Nissan estimates that after five years the batteries will degrade down to approximately 55 miles per charge.  Assuming that the car is driven a very conservative 10,000 miles per year, and most people will then trade in the vehicle at the 5 year mark due to the degradation in battery life, then the very large initial emissions from its manufacture will cause it to put more carbon-dioxide in the atmosphere than a gas powered car of similar size driven the same number of miles.  A similar sized gas powered car puts out 12 ounces of carbon-dioxide for every mile driven.  Assuming that the electric car is charged from an electric grid that is still using fossil fueled power plants (which most are and probably won’t be changing over to nuclear anytime soon, due to the fear of nuclear energy, but that’s for a different post) the electric car will be responsible for the emission of close to 15 ounces of CO2 for every mile driven. 

Doing a little math we can break it down this way:

	Electric         Car	Gas Car
Carbon Output at Manufacture in Pounds	30,000	14,000
Ounces per Mile Driven	15	12
Miles Driven	50000	50000
Total Carbon Output in Pounds	76,875	51,500

The electric vehicle will not have a lower carbon footprint until the gas vehicle has traveled at least 84,000 miles.  Given the current average lifespan of a car at 200,000 miles, by driving an electric car you would reduce carbon dioxide output by 46.8%, but that is only if you drive one electric car and then stop driving all together.  Over the life span of a gasoline car of comparable size to that of the current electric cars, such as the Nissan Leaf or Ford Focus, the carbon output is 164,000 pounds.  Let us assume that once the batteries in your “Zero Emissions” vehicle start to decline at 50,000 miles, and you trade in your car and buy a new one, you have just added 30,000 pounds of carbon without even driving a mile.  In fact, in order to go the same distance in an electric vehicle as a gas vehicle, you would have to go through four electric vehicles resulting in a total carbon output of 307,500 pounds. That equals 143,500 more pounds of carbon than would have been produced by only driving a gasoline car.  Of course, all of the figures assume that you never drive a gasoline car at all, which most people are unable to do at this time because of the limited range of current electric vehicles. 

Comparative Environmental Life Cycle Assessment of Conventional and Electric Vehicles

Nissan Leaf Specs

This is only part 1, in later posts we will look at the day to day costs of driving electric vs conventional.     I'm interested to hear your thoughts below.  

A Whole New Outlook on Things

Welcome to Politics and Economics with a twist.  My hope is that you will find this blog informative, insightful, and get you thinking in a different mind set.  I have created this out of a sort of necessity, for you see I can be very opinioned just like anyone who writes about political issues, but at the same time, I try to use some truth in making my opinions.  Numbers are one of the best ways to show facts and make a point.  Granted I know that you can make statistics say anything you want them to and there might even be instances where the stats that I find might play more to my line of thinking, but I try to find information from the true source of the topic at hand. 

Now I know you’re probably wondering who I am and why have I decided to start yet another blog about politics.  Well I’m an 11-year Navy veteran, a small business owner, a full time college student, a libertarian, and I’m gay.  There is a reason that I put those items in that order, because that’s what makes me, me.  There are way too many people out there that believe that if you fit into a subset of a community then you need to subscribe to that communities views.  I’m hoping to dispel that myth. 

I spent 11 years in the Navy working in IT with a specialty in Information Assurance and Security.  I come from a military upbringing as well, mom and dad are both retired from the USAF and my brother is currently a pilot in the Air Force, so you could say I’m the black sheep of the family by choosing to go Navy, but I wouldn’t have changed that decision for anyone.  After leaving the Navy I worked for a government contractor for 2 years, then decided to break off and start my own IT Consulting firm.  While running my own company I’m also a full time student getting a dual major in Management Information Systems & Finance with a minor in quantitative economics. 

This brings us to the next two topics, libertarian and gay.  The majority of gay people are democrats because they’re allegedly the ones that support gay rights.  You then have the gays that are republicans that are called “Log Cabin Republicans”.  I have always been more on the republican side of politics, but once I learned about the libertarian party they’re the ones that just seemed to make sense to me.  I’m not going to break down all the views of the libertarian party, but I will place a link to their main site if you’re interested in learning more.  The overall Libertarian belief system is live and let live.  Your freedom stops at the very point another person’s freedom begins.  Don’t harm, or defraud anyone, defend yourself, but don’t initiate force.  Under the libertarian philosophy you can be gay, you can have a committed relationship with whomever you choose.  We also believe that governments that govern best govern least.  Essentially it boils down to do your actions and/or beliefs affect someone else? If not then it’s not a big deal.  There are some issues that differ between the libertarians and the gay rights movement.  One of those being hate crimes.  A libertarian believes there is no differentiation of crime.  Libertarians don’t care the motivation, harm someone and you’re going to pay the price.  Criminal activity is criminal activity. 

I won’t just be covering politics on here; we’ll also take a look at various things that are affecting the economy as well, such as raising the minimum wage.  Politics and Economics truly do go hand in hand.  That must be why you the economics and political science majors have a lot of the same general courses.

I hope you enjoy this exciting journey that I'm going to take you all on.  My goal is to release at least one blog a week on differing issues.  Some of them may not be as current as others but all of them will be things that I do feel very strongly about and think that everyone should take a closer look at and examine in maybe a different way than they thought of before.

~J~